A Couple More Cool Free Gadgets

As you've probably noticed by now, I tend to focus a lot on freeware offerings, and although an apparent disdain exist for the Windows operating system, which is essentially the only one I use, here's a couple more of the same...

This first one is an offering from the UK based website RadioTools. besides sporting a handsome clock interface it also is acts a functional indicator display for any number of alerts you decide to implement into it (examples described below).
In my opinion, this would be best used wall mounted, maybe dedicate an old pc you might have laying around for it.. Of course I there's nothing wrong with it being used on the same pc as your automation operates on (I assume most do) and maximizing its widow when you're not on the pc.
Studio Clock for Windows
A studio clock application for use around your station including a customisable logo, studio name, station strapline or RadioText banners, automatic status indicators for silence and overload which can be triggered from the PC sound card and many other on-screen alerts and alarms (such as telephone, door, Major News Story and RDS Traffic active) which can be set and reset via a network connection. The screen includes an updatable text field that can be used to show the station's RadioText or "now playing" details and various other indicators that were originally designed for our in-house broadcast management platform. This application can be used with both traditional 4:3 monitors (1024x768 screen resolution) and widescreen 16:9 monitors (1280x768) by changing a setting in the configuration file and can run as a "stand-alone" clock or as part of a management platform. We recommend installing TimeSyncTool on the same PC rather than Windows built in network time client, to ensure the exact time is always maintained.
Get your for free now:
http://www.radiotools.uk/index.html



Another free studio gadget:
VUMeter
I happen to like analog VU meters - particularly those having vintage appearance, there are numerous vst plugin offering this which are more attractive, but this one functions as a stand alone, run on even the oldest Windows pc, non buggy and doesn't use up resources. It's pretty basic, function accurately. I can't give comparison since this is about the only software analog meter I've ever used (from time to time) with any kind of consistency, but I always liked it and it can be useful. And of course it's free.

Softronic Review:
VUMETER is an analog audio meter old - fashioned used to visually monitor sound levels of your PC. VUMETER is an application which measures all the sounds that are occurring on the PC with what is useful regardless of the player used. The options of VUMeter three: the option "always visible", the adjustment of the sensitivity scale and the selection of the input device. To access the options you must right click on the program. This vumeter is monophonic and stereo. measure the output signals, not the input signals.


http://www.vuplayer.com



ESSENTIAL PART 15 TIP

In the midst of discussion, the discussion discussed detoured on how to best attain AM coverage range.. I'm not going to link you to the specific Part15.us thread because the topic was besides the point, except for a single line that really stood out to me and it is indeed the best Part 15 piece of advice you'll ever get...

ALERT!: IMPORTANT!: ESSENTIAL PART 15 TIP:

"To reach your target area with a part 15 AM system you must locate the transmitter and antenna at the target location."

ESSENTIAL PART 15 TIP IS QUOTE OF CARL BLARE

That quote illustrates the secret of a successful Part 15 installation. If you can do that, then you've got it made. "Think small, cause that's all you got, and once you perfect it, it might be a lot." -- Doctor Seuss
...Ok, the doctor didn't really say that but he would have if he were here.



Thanks Philco for Part 15 Broadcasting

Here we look at the original creation of the rules in 1938, which in it's inception was not #15 but #24. The law was created to provide "substantive" rules specifically providing a right for anyone to utilize it's capabilities.


(The dictionary states that Substantive law refers to the body of rules that determine the rights and obligations of individuals and collective bodies.).


The rules itself had been created to allow a open means to broadcast, but within them included the "exception" that it must not exceed certain limits so not to interfere with licensed broadcasters.
So the way I see it, the law was created specifically to allow unlicensed broadcasting but to be maintained in respect to not causing interference to licensed broadcasters.
The primary objective was to permit free unlicensed broadcasting for the public
The only stipulation was to not cause interference to those who are licensed.


Shown here are the Part 24 Rules in it's entirety, extracted from page 2999 of the original 1938 Federal Register or page 85 of the linked document.

After locating this, I set out to locate any related documents which preceded this to determine what arguments had led to these rules being created to begin with.. I haven't found them yet, however I did come across a very interesting QST Amateur Radio magazine article April 1942 (via this reprint at  rfcafe.com) which explains what actually had prompted the rule to be created; below is a brief excerpt which applies directly to the topic at hand.

"...Until 1938, that is. In that year Philco engineers, seeking a remote-control tuning system without the inconvenient multi-wire cables and accompanying complexities, evolved the idea of using an inductively coupled r.f. transformer with its primary and secondary spaced as much as 75 feet. The primary of this transformer was supplied from a small battery-powered oscillator, and the voltage induced in the secondary fed a supplementary amplifier in the b.c. set.

Naturally, because of its resemblance to a conventional transmitter and receiver, questions arose concerning the legality of the device. After considerable debate pro and con and a hearing or two, the FCC finally handed down rules cov­ering the subject. For the record, those rules are reproduced here in their entirety:..."
It then continues from there quoting the Part 24 Rules which is shown above.

So there you have it, evidently we have Philco to thank for setting the ball in motion which ultimately led to the Part 15 broadcasting we have today!

Thanks Philco!

NOUO Notices of Unlicensed Operation

Note: The following was originally posted Thursday, April 10, 2014 (see here for the original archived version), and additions have been included. The list shown below now reflects an updated version, current as of January 1, 2018..

 NOUO stands for Notice Of Unlicensed Operation,. If you ever receive one of these as a Part 15 broadcaster, it will be because your install or power input is incorrect.. In other words, if you ever get one, it's because you were not following the rules..

Most NOUOs include the following information..
The Commission's records show that no license was issued for operation of a broadcast station on [frequency] at this location..
The only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules,.. ..the maximum permitted level of 15.0 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S15.209(a). Or the alternative method may be used; Section 15.219(b) of the Rules states "The total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 3 meters."

You can access records of everyone of them going back 10 years at the FCC website: http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/  ( I only went back looking three years )

There have been only 7 instances of the FCC shutting down supposed Part 15 AM broadcasters in the past 3 years [from Jan 1, 2011 to Jan. 17 2014]... Compare this to the estimate of 1,000's of FM broadcasters receiving NOUO's in the same time frame.

[[EDIT Jan. 1, 2018: The list below has been updated, with 3 more NOUO's which had occurred bringing it to a total of 10* NOUOs in the last 7 years]]
*See additional notes to the to the following NOUOs to explain the "total of 10

Basically, with Part 15 AM, there are only two factors you must adhere to:

1. Your antenna system can not exceed ten foot.. 

You can mount your transmitter with it's ten foot whip 50 foot in the air if you wanted too, and you'd be legal, but the problem is you can't attach a ground wire to your transmiitter, because that ground wire would in effect extend your antenna that additional 50 foot!

2. Your power input can not exceed 100mw

Below are shown every NOUO issued (in the last 3 years) to an AM broadcaster for being non-compliant with Part 15 rules and regulations. Every one of them was due to excessive antenna system.. Avoid making the same mistake and you'll be fine

These are edited down versions, click the respective links to read each document in its entirety..


===================================================
                 0 NOUO so far in 2018  
  ===================================================

Zero so far in 2018

===================================================
                 0 NOUO in 2017   
  ===================================================

From November 3, 2016
thru January 1, 2018,
No NOUO's were issued in the AM broadcast band,

===================================================
                 1 NOUO in 2016  
  ===================================================

1700AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-342090A1.html
 November 3, 2016
Chabad Lubavitch Hospitality Center
Eshel Hachnosas Orchim
Brooklyn, New York
 Case Number: EB-FIELDNER-16-00022595
 Document Number:  W201732380003

On October 26, 2016, agents from this office confirmed by direction finding techniques that radio signals on frequency 1700 kHz were emanating from your building located at 272 Kingston Avenue, Brooklyn, New York... The Commissions' rules permit operation on any frequency between 525 kHz and 1705 kHz with a transmitter whose input power of the final RF stage of the transmitter does not exceed 100 mW. See Section 15.209.. If the transmitter does not comply with this requirement then the field strength of the signal on frequency 1700 kHz may not exceeded the 14.1uV/m at 30 meters.   See Section 15.209 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.209.  The station apparently did not comply with either of these requirements and thus is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 301.
(Notice they mistakenly state 15.209 twice, yet still describing 15.219 though not mentioning the ground)

===================================================
                 0 NOUO in 2015   
  ===================================================

From January 18, 2014  
thru January 1, 2016,
No NOUO's were issued in the AM broadcast band,
 

===================================================
                 3 NOUO in 2014   
  ===================================================
1710AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-325287A1.html
  January 17, 2014
   Leonid Lytvynchuk
Everett, Washington 98204
   Case Number: EB-FIELDWR-14-00013037
    Document Number:  W201432980001

  On December 13, 2013, agents from this office confirmed by direction finding techniques that radio signals on frequency 1710 kHz were emanating from your residence..  The field strength of the signal on frequency 1710 kHz exceeded the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 uV/m at 30 meters established in section 15.223(a)... as well as the  general unlicensed limit of 30 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a)...

1610AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-329959A1.html
  October 9, 2014
   Steven Cherry
  Hamtramck, Michigan.
   Case Number:  -EB-FIELDNER-14-00013074
    Document Number:  W201532360001

  The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 kHz was measured at 30,000  microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 40.7 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 uV/m (24000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules. Another exception for some transmitters operating in the 510 kHz to 1705... The investigtion by this office determined that the ground lead itself was longer than 3  meters..

1710AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-325287A1.html
  January 17, 2014
   Leonid Lytvynchuk
    Everett, Washington 98204
   Case Number:  EB-FIELDWR-14-00013037
    Document Number:  W201432980001

  On December 13, 2013,
  The field strength of the signal on frequency 1710 kHz exceeded the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 uV/m at 30 meters established in section 15.223(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R §§ 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on  1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R § 15.209(a).

  ===================================================
             6 NOUO (not 7, see note) in 2013... 
  ===================================================

1710AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-322711A1.html
   July 23, 2013
   Luis Sanchez
   Bronx, New York
   Case Number: EB-FIELDNER-13-00010214
   Document Number: W2013323800044

   On July 18, 2008,
   The field strength of the signal on frequency 1710 kHz was measured at 3,100 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 474 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 30 uV/m at 30 meters for non-licensed devices set out in Section 15.209 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. S 15.209.

Note: This one strikes me rather odd.. The date of the NOUO is July 23 2013, but the filed report is from July 18, 2008...???..   I suppose it's just  a mistype somehow.

===================================================                                    
                              
1600AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-321497A1.html
   June 4, 2013
   Edwin & Teresita Ruiz
   Oswego, Illinois
   Case Number: EB-FIELDNER-13-00008449
   Document Number: W201332320003

   On May 2, 2013,
   The field strength of the signal on frequency 1600  kHz was measured at 8400 microvolts per meter (uV/m ) at 89 meters, which exceeds the maximum permitted level of 15.0 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S15.209(a).

   In addition,.. The source of the 1600 kHz signal is a vertical whip antenna approximately 3 meters long, mounted atop a 50 foot tower in the backyard of 416 Orchard Avenue. The total length of the antenna and transmission line exceeds the 3 meter restriction in Section 15.219(b) of the Rules. See 47 C.F.R. 15.219(b).

  ===================================================   

1700AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-319885A1.html
   March 29, 2013
   Sergey Kibitskiy
   Everett, Washington
   Case Numbers: EB-FIELDWR-13-00007506
   Document Number: W201332980013

   On March 22, 2013,
   Your operation on frequency 1710 kHz was measured at 6,400 uV/m at approximately 251 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 24000/1700(kHz) or 14.11 uV/m at 30 meters established in section 15.209(a) for operation on 1700 kHz, 47 C.F.R SS 15.209(a).

  ===================================================   

1710AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-319576A1.html
   March 13, 2013
   Peter Kozodoy
   Mountlake Terrace, Washington 98043
   Case Numbers: EB-FIELDWR-13-00007118
   Document Number: W201332980012

   On March 4, 2013,
   Your operation on frequency 1710 kHz was measured at 6,100 uV/m at approximately 125 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 uV/m at 30 meters established in section 15.223(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R SS 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R SS 15.209(a).

  ===================================================
???? - It's curious to note that in the above NOUO, there was no mention made of 15.219, which of course has no field strength limitations, and is a proper alternative method of transmitting Part 15 AM. Therefore, legally the above was clearly an improper enforcement since it lacked any presentation of evidence in the report showing 15.219 was also in violation.
  ===================================================


1700AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-319568A1.html
   March 13, 2013
   Gerald Richard Gaule
   Vancouver, Washington 98685
   Case Numbers: EB-FIELDWR-13-00006961
   Document Number: W201332920006

   On February 26, 2013,
   Your operation on frequency 1700 kHz was measured at 1,800 uV/m at approximately 175 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 14.11 uV/m (24,000/1,700) at 30 meters established in section 15.209(a) for operation on 1700 kHz, see Section 47 C.F.R S 15.209(a).

  ===================================================


1700AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-319569A1.html
   March 13, 2013
   Teal Pointe Apartments
   Vancouver, Washington  98685
   Case Number: EB-FIELDWR-12-00006961
   Document Number: W201332920007

   On February 26, 2013,
   The operation on frequency 1,700 kHz  was measured at 1,800 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at  175  meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 14.11 uV/m (24,000/1,700) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Commission's Rules. Thus, this station is  operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. S 301

  =================================================== 

Note that the above two NOUOs are one in the same.. Teal Pointe Apartments are located at 10405 NE 9th, which is the same address of the Richard Gaul NOUO

  ===================================================       

1710AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-319247A1.html
   February 27, 2013
   Vladimir Kachinskiy
   Mt Vernon, Washington 98273
   Case Numbers: EB-FIELDWR-13-00006836
   Document Number: W201332980007

   On February 7, 2013,
   Your operation on frequency 1710 kHz was measured at 6,000 uV/m at approximately 217 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 uV/m at 30 meters established in section 15.223(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R SS 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1710 kHz, 47 C.F.R SS 15.209(a).

  ===================================================
                      2 NOUO in 2012   
  ===================================================

1610AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-315222A1.html
   July 11, 2012
   Desert Christian Schools
   Lancaster, CA 93534
   Case Number: EB-FIELDWR-12-00002784
   Document Number: W201232900007

   On June 13, 2012
   The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 kHz  was measured at 2,060  microvolts per meter (uV/m) at  134  meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 uV/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a)).

   The investigation by this office determined that the ground lead was longer than the length of a 2-story tall building, thereby, increasing the total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead well beyond 3 meters. This installation violated Section 15.219(b) of the Rules.

  ===================================================   


1680AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-313358A1.html
   March 28, 2012
   EPI Limited Partnership
   Fullerton, CA
   Case Number: EB-FIELDWR-12-00001143
   Document Number: W201232900006

   On January 30, 2012,  agents from this office confirmed by direction finding techniques that radio signals on frequency 1680 kHz were emanating from the property at  1370 Brea Blvd., Suite 205, Fullerton, CA  92835.  On February 29, 2012, the agents re-visited the above address and confirmed that the signals were still emanating from that location.

   The  field strength of the signal  on frequency 1680 kHz was measured at 17,900  microvolts per meter (uV/m) at 60 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.3  uV/m  24000/1680) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a)).

   During their investigation on February 29, 2012, the agents determined that the ground lead was connected to a cable that ran down the length of the antenna tower, thereby, increasing the total length of the antenna, transmission line, and ground lead well beyond 3 meters. This installation violated Section 15.219(b) of the Rules. During that inspection, the agents observed that the ground lead at a point close to the street level had been cut, leaving the line at its original length, but not physically connected to the ground. This configuration will also violate Section 15.219(b) of the Rules as the total length of the antenna,transmission line, and the lead, attached to the transmitter, exceeded 3 meters.

  ===================================================
           4 (not 7) NOUO (see notes) in 2011  
  ===================================================

1620AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309211A1.html
(a) August 19, 2011
   Robert Mohamed
   South Richmond Hill, NY
   Case Number: EB-11-NY-0230
   Document Number: W201132380006

   On August 3, 2011,
   Your operation on frequency 1620 kHz  was measured at 900 microvolt per meter (uV/m) at  1132 meters. This exceeds the allowable unlicensed limit of 100 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.223(a) for operation on 1620 kHz, 47 C.F.R. S: 15.223(a), as well as the general unlicensed limit of 30 uV/m at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) for operation on 1620 kHz. 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a).

  ===================================================

1620AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309312A1.html
(b) August 23, 2011
   Robert Mohamed Corrected copy
   South Richmond Hill, NY
   Case Number: EB-11-NY-0230
   Document Number: W201132380006

   On August 3, 2011,
   The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620 kHz was measured at 900 microvolts per meter (uV/m) at  1132  meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 uV/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a)).

  ===================================================

NOTES: The above two shown NOUOs (a) & (b) are actually the same NOUO, not two as it appears.
       It is only a correction of the same report.

  ===================================================

1610AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-309212A1.html
   August 19, 2011
   Willie Walton
   Santa Clarita, California
   Case Number: EB-11-LA-0092
   Document Number: W201132900010

   On August 11, 2011,  
The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 kHz  was measured at 2,730  microvolts per meter (uV/m) at  145  meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 uV/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209(a) of the Rules (see 47 C.F.R. S: 15.209(a)).

   The investigation by this office determined that the ground lead was connected to a cable that ran down the length of the antenna tower, thereby, increasing the total length of the antenna, transmission line, and ground lead well beyond 3 meters. This installation violated Section 15.219(b) of the Rules.

  ===================================================

1650AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308327A1.html
(c)July 5, 2011
   Xeng Xiong
   St. Paul, Minnesota
   Case Number: EB-11-CG-0028
   Document Number: W201132320008

   On May 15, 2011,
   the field strength of the signal on frequency 1650  kHz was measured at 550 microvolts per meter (uV/m ) at 353 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.5 uV/m (24,000/1650) at 30 meters established in section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)).

   During the inspection on May 15, 2011, the agent observed the station had five  antennas mounted on the roof, each with a vertical whip approximately 3  meters long, and the ground leads totaled over 15 meters in length. This   antenna installation violated section 15.219(b) of the Rules.

  ===================================================

1620 and 1630AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-308328A1.html
(d) July 5, 2011
   Kou D. Her
   St. Paul, Minnesota
   Case Number: EB-11-CG-0129
   Document Number: W201132320009

   On May 16, 2011, an agent from this office confirmed by direction finding techniques that (1) radio signals on frequency 1620 kHz were emanating from 1146 Rice Street in St. Paul and (2) radio signals on frequency 1630 kHz were emanating from 399 East Maryland Avenue in St. Paul. .... The owners of the properties where these stations are located reported to the agent that they granted you permission to install transmitters at those locations.

   The field strength of the signal on frequency 1620  kHz (1146 Rice Street) was measured at 470 microvolts per meter (uV/m ) at 1243 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.8 uV/m (24,000/1620) at 30 meters established in section 15.209(a) of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R. S:15.209(a)). Similarly, the field strength of the signal on 1630 kHz (399 East Maryland Avenue) was measured at 450 uV/m at 599 meters, which also exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.7 uV/m at 30 meters.

   During the inspection on May 16, 2011, the agent observed that the approximate length of the antenna, transmission line and the ground lead at 1146 Rice Street was approximately 26 meters.
   Similarly, the ground lead at 399 East Maryland Avenue exceeded approximately 3 meters in length. These installations violated section 15.219(b) of the Rules.

  ===================================================

NOTES: The two above violations involved what sounds to be clusters of transmitters on multiple roofs. Both (c) & (d) consist of three violations within 24 hours, in the same town and close proximity to each other, which indicates them to be a single group entity.. So for this reason these could be considered as just one NOUO, not two.

  ===================================================

1610AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306481A1.html
(e) May  5, 2011
   Gregory C. Schuller, Sr.
   Sadie M. Schuller
   Arizona City, Arizona
   Case Number: EB-10-SD-0217
   Document Number: W201132940007

   On April 21,
   The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 KHz was measured at 1,900  microvolts per meter (uV/m) at  130 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 uV/m
  
  During the investigation on April 21, 2011, the agents observed that the approximate length of the antenna, transmission line and the ground lead was 8 meters. This installation violated Section 15.219(b) of the Rules.

  ===================================================

1610AM
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-306483A1.html
(f) May  5, 2011
   Audie Ray Morrow
   Sandra Jean Morrow
   Casa Grande, Arizona
   Case Number: EB-11-SD-0086
   Document Number: W201132940008

   On April 21, 2011,
   The field strength of the signal on frequency 1610 KHz was measured at 1,200  microvolts per meter (uV/m) at  430 meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 14.9 uV/m (24,000/1610) at 30 meters established in Section 15.209 of the Rules (See 47 C.F.R.  S:15.209(a)).

   During the investigation on April 21, 2011, the agents observed that the approximate length of the antenna, transmission line and the ground lead was 10 meters. This installation violated Section 15.219(b) of the Rules.

  ===================================================

NOTES: Casa Grande and Arizona city are only about 10 miles apart..add the facts that they both broadcast on the same frequency, and were both cited on the same day, one could easily conclude that they were also just one group working together to cover a larger area.. So again, these two can also be considered in essence a single NOUO.

  ===================================================

So remember, being a part 15 broadcaster means following the part 15 rules and regulations...

]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[
EDIT: February 11, 2018 Addum..
I've never seen the following before!..
Evidently the Low Power Radio Blog had posted a similar study from what turned out to be from 2002-2010. The following link provides a brief breakdown of the citation causes
http://lowpowerradio.blogspot.com/2011/01/fcc-enforcement-actions.html

I have took his findings and organized them in order, adding the dates and years of the agents visits so I could get a better idea of what I was looking at:

2010:
February 23, 2010
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297000A1.html
March 23, 2010
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297435A1.html
March 24, 2010
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-297432A1.html
July 29, 2010
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301193A1.html
August 2, 2010
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301194A1.html
August 11, 2010
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301930A1.html
August 11, 2010
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301931A1.html
August 26, 2010
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-301328A1.html
October 15, 2010
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-302462A1.html

2009:
October 20, 2009
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-294572A1.html
November 19, 2009
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295062A1.html
November 24, 2009
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295060A1.html
December 9, 2009
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-295836A1.html

2008:
March 13, 2008
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-280829A1.html

2007:
March 7, 2007
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-272448A1.html

2005:
April 13, 2005
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-258884A1.html
August 17, 2005
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-261747A1.html

2004:

Repeated NOUOs in 2004
Numerous NOUO's in 2004 spanning June 15, 24, August 25, October 7, and October 28, utimately lead to a NAL
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260406A1.html


2003:
NAL 1710 AM in 2003:
January 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 18, 21, 29, 30 and February 27 2003
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-237849A1.html

2002:
Another repeated offender from 2002-2004:
(Operating on both AM & FM)
2002:
October  7, 24, 25, and November 1,
2003:
May 20 , August 15,
2004:
March 22
https://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-246123A1.html

LPH #3 Neil Radio8Z

Lately I've been rebroadcasting some of the original Low Power Hour episodes hosted by Carl Blare. Although I enjoy all Carl's shows, I have particular fondness of the ones which feature interviews with other part15 broadcasters, and here is another one of those...

A previous post had featured one of my favorites; "Car Tunes" with guest Charles Hefti, if you had'nt checked it out already, then be sure to see that previous post. But today is a summary of the episode which immediately followed that one:

Low Power Hour # 3 - Guest Neil Radio8Z
This episode which aired during Christmas Week 2010 starts off with a few email comments about the previous show and touches briefly on the subjects of home base internet servers, Ham operations, and something about a bird in the woods.. plus a little about legal unlicensed LPB in other countries. Carl Blare, the host mentions his own SStran 3000 operation, and after a few more ramblings he introduces the guest of episode 3;  Neil in Ohio.

Neil broadcast part 15 on both AM and FM. Evidently Neil's wife had been disappointed when her favorite local licensed station switched from a classical music format to all talk.. So Neil remedied her dissatisfaction by creation of a new part15 classical station, and thus, satisfied his wife. Good job Neil!

Discussion continues concerning locating crystals for a shortwave transmitter project which Carl had been working on, also a little about Neil's vintage Knight kit and the modifications he made to it. Also touched upon was the history of phono-ocilators which transmitted from a record player to a radio, these were the earliest part15 devices, and Part 15 hadn't really changed much since that time.

Neil usually utilizes the high quality SStran 3000, which he is very satisfied with, but he also makes mention of his other part15 transmitter, a Ramsey unit, which he's not too fond of due to some improper modulation characteristics he had observed, and though he attempted to compensate with some modification, he finally decided to just put it away in a drawer somewhere, but he considers them ok for experimentation.
Many part15 broadcasters are also Ham operators, and this topic is also discussed along with some of the most basic of rules concerning it, which provides a general overview of that hobby. Certain Ham broadcast have a special exemption to allow one way broadcast presentation type within a "net" structure, which Neil describes some of the details and his involvement with it.

Oddly enough the last few minutes of this episodes concludes featuring a rebroadcast of "Pirates Week" where that host had played some clips from Carl's previous Low Power Hour episode 2 "Car Tunes".. which just goes to show you I'm not the only one who found that episode to be one of my favorites!


So there you have it a recap of this episode rerun. Hear it again! Please note you must contact :The Low Power Hour for rights to rebroadcast - It's free, but you are asked to let Carl know!


Low Power Hour # 3 - Guest Neil Radio8Z


If you would like to hear more Low Power Hour episodes, or would like to air them on your own station (free!), You can contact Carl Blair via his website at http://kdxradio.com or at the part15.us forums