Thursday, February 25, 2016

The nitty-gritty on a part 15 radio station broadcasting copyright music.

Back in the 90's I had an old 45 record jukebox in a little diner of mine for about 5 years..
5 plays for $1.00  It was a free loner from a man I used to work for. I bought the 45's from a store that sold old LP's in town to keep the music selection rotated.

I was well aware that the newer CD jukeboxes all the other businesses had exhibited BMI stickers with some kind of small print claimer explaining the mandatory requirements of it being displayed..

My old jukebox had such a sticker, but it was well expired, and I didn't give it a second thought. It sat there for 3 or 4 years taking in enough quarters per month to cover my electric bill (which at the time averaged about $500), but eventually a customer, who happened to be somehow associated with one of the amusement companies that supplied jukeboxes to the area, began giving me all kinds of grief about my jukebox not having a current license on it. - He was drunk and belligerent, and I pretty much brushed him off.

A week or two later, my landlord who also operated the bar in the back showed me some kind of threating letter he received in the mail, and told me to either get it licensed or get the box out.... I opted to get it licensed, which wasn't much,  less than $100 if I recall right.

The whole point is that for me to legally play that old music in a public 25x15 foot room, meant I had to get a license, because it was for public consumption.. You might be barely able to hear it if you were across the street.
But there is no denying that the legal requirements of public presentation of copyright music is there.


So then, If my part 15 station were to consist of copyrighted music programming, and it was not as a commercial venture. would I pay BMI?..
Honestly, I don't know, it would depend on my pocket, and if coming up with that $250 a year cost would hurt me or not (sometimes $250 can be a lot).

If it were a for-profit station, then definitely.


But what you all do is up to you, but if the emphasis and concern is that of legal broadcasting (as it should be), well then, it's just as relevant as the length of your antenna.

Or you can just kid yourself.

 www.bmi.com/licensing/entry/radio






Here is what RadioPilot, a member at part15.us does, and had to say about the matter:


"..... I have recieved my licenses from BMI, ASCAP, and SESAC...
The BMI license is $200.00yr from the time they grant you the license...
The ASCAP license is $123.00 and it's for one year also... they say the LPFM license was the form to use.... the SESAC license is $85.00 and it's for one year... so I think these are reasonable fees...  The BMI license states that any station earning over $10,000yr in commercial fees must revert to a regular license.. which is $450.00yr +... depending on your earnings for the year... or how you decide to 'hide' the earnings.... I intend on making my station earn it's keep by having commercials so the advertisers must be protected from liability from using music on the air... the fines are pretty steep and I would consult an attorney before you attempt to air music outside the boundary of your yard... This is my take on this and I feel that having the licenses helps to protect you from the big boys calling your station in to BMI, ASCAP, and SESAC.. which will get you into hot water.... Radiopilot"
http://www.part15.us/forum/part15-forums/general-discussion/copywrite-fees

Saturday, February 20, 2016

Maintaing the quality of your edited MP3's.

Audacity is a great tool for editing mp3's, but one of the problems with editing content of an mp3 -with most any audio editor- is that by saving your changes, it in turn recompresses the new file, and due to the nature of mp3's results in actually degrading the audio quality, as compared to the original.

You can lesson the degradation a little by saving it at a higher bitrate than the original was, but that makes it a larger file, and still doesn't completely eliminate the quality loss.
Another option is that when your finished editing, to save it as an uncompressed wave, which should maintain the audio quality of the original.. but that makes it an even larger file size than the previous option.
So often, what many of us do is just opt to accept a certain degree of audio quality loss for the sake of the final edit.

But there is another option.. Depending on what kind of editing you wish to employ, there is a completely non destructive way to a edit mp3!
If you don't need to enhance the original file with processing, but just want to do basic things like; cut out certain parts, move portions of the content around, adjust or normalize the volume, or have it fade in or out at certain points, or even split sections into entirely separate mp3 files.. Then your in luck, because you can easily do all that with a free program called mp3DirectCut.
This is a fast and simple program to use, that's easy on the resources, and to top it all off, it's free!
This is a Windows program, but you can use it on Linux with Wine.
I highly recommend you include it in your part 15 box of tools.. http://mpesch3.de1.cc/mp3dc.html

fast mpeg audio editing
mp3DirectCut

All you need to cut your mp3

mp3DirectCut is a fast and extensive audio editor and recorder for compressed mp3. You can directly cut, copy, paste or change the volume with no need to decompress your files for audio editing. This saves encoding time and preserves the original quality, because nothing will be re-encoded. The built in recorder creates mp3 on the fly from your audio input. Using Cue sheets, pause detection or Auto cue you can easily divide long files.

Features

•Non-destructive cut, copy, paste    
•Volume change, fade, normalize    
•MP3 recording with ACM or Lame encoder    
•Fast MPEG visualisation and easy navigation    
•Layer 2 support (dvd/dvb audio)    
•AAC support    
•Batch processing    
•Cue Sheet support    
•Pause detection    
•Auto cue (track dividing by time values)    
•Track splitting with filename and tag creation    
•Trim · Crop · Fast play · Loop play    
•ID3v1.1 tag editor · ID3v2 tag keeping    
•VU meter · bitrate visualisation    
•High speed recorder · Command line usage   
•Unicode support


Get your copy now.. http://mpesch3.de1.cc/mp3dc.html


Brilliant and unique use of ZaraRadio


ZaraRadio is a very popular choice of automation software for Part 15 radio stations, not just because it's free, but because it's so full featured, capable, stable, and simple to comprehend. So I find it fitting to tell you about an add-on of sorts that had been created to extend ZaraRadio's capabilities..

I was recently reminded by a rare visit by an elusive member by the name of dosman, on the part15.us/forum earlier today. He came to post information of an update a program he wrote called ZaraRadio event file dumper . You can read his post by clicking the link you just passed.

But what I was saying - was I was reminded of a little program which I first came across a few years ago and never really got around to experimenting with.. It was also designed by dosman.. And.. because I'm feeling lazy.. I'm just going to copy and paste what I had originally posted about it at http://www.part15.us/blogs/brilliant-and-unique-use-zararadio when I first came aware of it...

...............................................................................

January 25, 2014 - 04:18
RichPowers's picture
This has got to be the coolest Part 15 related thing I've stumbled across since discovering Carls Low Power Hour!..
This guy has a Part 15 station: "The Ocho! operates on the north end of town and can be heard along parts of Old 37 and Walnut Street."  .. I didn't see any mention of what city or state 'Old 37 and Walnut street' might be in, nor if the station is currently is still in operation or not. But it apparently was from 2006 to 20011.

I just ran a search on Part15.us a few moments ago and see that he is a member and has posted here a few times, but it doesn't look as though anyone ever gave a response.. I think it might be because no one understood what the hell he was talking about.

Anyway, I fell across his website and discovered a really brilliant thing he created to use with ZaraRadio (at least I think it's brilliant, it's new to me). He came up with a way of using Zara Radio to control 3rd party scripts for additional automation. He has Zara running on his windows pc and.. well, here it is in his own words..
http://ibmgeek.shacknet.us/ocho

"..We've been able to run a 100% automated radio station using a second linux box to generate text-to-speech updates for weather, news, and the hourly gas price report for our town. So far we've been using a "pull" methodoligy were the Zara playout host downloads updated dynamic content (text-to-speech) from the linux box using batch files and wget for Windows. This works very well for content that only needs to be updated hourly like the gas and weather. The linux box updates the text-to-speech report a few minutes ahead of the playout time, then the Zara host downloads it just before the scheduled playout beings.."

He has some example mp3s there of the text to speech outputs, like: ap news, current events, gas reports, slashdot_headlines, and weather.
The computer voice sounds like a NOAA report, which would be fine (to me) for the weather and gas reports, but not the news and events. But there are better virtual voices availble I know. I can see something like this being very useful.
He goes on to say:

"..I've wanted to have the system annunciate the names of the songs played for a while but only recently figured out a way to do this. ZaraRadio needs a method to call scripts or otherwise initiate the regeneration of a text-to-speech reports except it does not directly support this. However there's no reason the playout log can't also be used to trigger events, if a script can watch the log it can pick up commands from it too. How do you inject commands though? Simple: add fake song names to your playlist. The song names contain metadata which your script knows how to read..."

He go on describing detailed but simple scripts, and also provides a download of the "Automated DJ" program he wrote. And he tried to tell us about it here, but no one seemed to listen!
I think this is so cool! Doesn't anybody else?
Check it out: http://ibmgeek.shacknet.us/ocho/ [updated link]

........................................

I missed this.. Evidently he has an updated version which can run on the same windows pc as zara is running on instead of on a separate pc with linux on it.
Here's the programs features:
Features
* Generates spoken audio from text input sources and websites
* Mixes in randomly chosen background music if desired
* Outputs to either mp3 or wav formats (mp3 is prefered)
* Chooses random sentences from a phrase book file for dynamic reports
Ex: "And now the 1680AM gas prices from around town" and "What a fine $SEASON day for gas, prices that is"
* Garble protection - the script tries to detect errors in html processing and aborts gracefully
Ex: When a website changes their HTML the DJ will announce "Danger! Will Robinson" rather than treat your listeners to the sound of raw HTML being fed into a text2speech engine.
* Script, modules, and support files are self-documented for easy customization
* Modular design allows easy addition of new content
* Has easily updated dictionaries to assist the text-to-speech software pronounce words correctly
Ex: "St." becomes "street", "911" becomes "nine eleven" rather than "nine hundred eleven"
* Experimental support for CGI streaming output
* Cygwin environment includes 12 voices plus 1 male voice for speaking Spanish

Included modules (supported input sources):
* Gas prices from gasbuddy.com
* Current weather from weather.com
* AP News from public RSS feeds
* News from Slashdot headlines
* News from Russia Today's English RSS feed
* USGS earthquake report
* Movie listings via Google by zip-code (based on theaters near a given zip-code)
* Current events for your locality, requires writing your own sub-modules for website calendars in your area


........................................

...we cant be at the console 24/7. and I see nothing wrong or uncommon about using a computer generated voice to automatically provide updated content on certain things like the time, weather, movie schedules, current gas prices, tides, and whatever else can be automatically obtained from outside feeds...
...By no means was I suggesting a computer voice being the primary personality, but only as an assistant. After all, how many part 15 stations would be running 24 hours a day without a computer.. and how many would not be running at all?

Original posting:
http://www.part15.us/blogs/brilliant-and-unique-use-zararadio

Dosman the Programmer:
1680AM The Ocho!
  • Automated DJ
  • Hear demo DJ reports
  • Improving Festival Voices
  • Using the Zara Radio playout log to control other scripts
  • How to Dump ZaraRadio Event Files

  • Check it out.

    That was lazy... I'll really have to post about this again after some experimentation..


     

    Monday, February 15, 2016

    Are Part 15 Stations Considered "Radio Stations" By The FCC?


    About five years ago I became involved in a brief debate with Bill and others at hobbybroadcaster.net on whether the FCC actually considered Part 15 stations as Radio Stations.
    I had argued, much to the disagreement of others, that of course they consider our flea-powered operations as radio stations! To me, it was a matter of common sense..

    Under FCC laws, a provision had been long established which enabled us a position in which we may publicly air most any form of audio programming we desire, providing that we adhere to the specific power and antenna limitations outlined in the applicable sections of part 15 -- or, in other words, we legally broadcast on the public airways, a selection of music, talk shows, commentaries, commercials, and whatever else, and the FCC is well aware of it and, under law, permits it..
    So it just stood to reason, of course the FCC considers us radio stations!

    I was a little in awe that others considered my view to be nonsense.

    The debate that ensued ranked up there as one of my favorites, -- not just because ultimately my point was proved true, but because during that unplanned, impromptu debate, it became evident that what was initially nothing more than just my casual expression of opinion on the matter, was actually backed by some very legitimate facts... I learned something.

    Are Part 15 Stations Considered "Radio Stations" By The FCC?

    One of the opposing views was "If this were true we'd be treated the same way with licensing, fees, logging requirements, etc. Sorry, but I have to respectfully disagree with that."

    The facts:
    If you are publicly broadcasting licensed, copyrighted music, regardless if yours is a licensed station, a Part 15 unlicensed station, or a bar room jukebox, you are required to obtain a license, pay the fees for the rights, and provide periodic logs (this is a touchy subject for some who disagree).

    For Part 15 stations, a license is obtainable from BMI at www.bmi.com/licensing/entry/radio; The contract is predominately displayed on the right menu, entitled "BMI Part 15 Station Radio License".  It is a 5 page contract which you are required to fill out and return with payment.
    A few excerpts from the BMI Contract:

    Part 1C: "Part 15 radio broadcasting shall mean audio "over-the-air" broadcasting in all of it's forms that is exempt by the Federal Communications Commission under section... ..Part 15 radio broadcasting does not include internet, cable or other online transmissions"
    Part 3A: "The annual license fee for the  Term is $249 and is payable upon execution of this License Agreement..."
    Part 4: As long as Part 15 Radio Broadcaster is not in default or arrears in payment under this Agreement, BMI agrees to indemnify, save and hold harmless and to defend Part 15 Radio Broadcaster, its advertisers and their advertising agencies, it's officers, employees, and artist, from and against all claims, demands and suits that may be made or brought against them or any of them with respect to the public performance under this Agreement of any material licensed hereunder;..."
    Part 8: Upon reasonable notice, Part 15 Radio Broadcaster agrees to furnish BMI list and certain required information concerning its performances of all musical works on forms provided by BMI..."
    Direct link to contract in it's entirety here: http://www.bmi.com/forms/licensing/radio/part_15_radio_license.pdf

    OK, so that's all very well and good, but it doesn't answer the question;
    Are Part 15 Stations Considered "Radio Stations" By The FCC?
    So let's answer that..

    True, within the Part 15 rules and regulations, nowhere is our audio transmissions on the public AM and FM bands specifically referred as "radio stations".  The way the FCC does define our transmitters under Part 15 is "intentional radiators".
    However, it is just as accurate to define a licensed station as an "intentional radiator"; the primary difference is it that they have much more power, and thus require a license and more rules to abide by.
    Part15 - Call it intentional radiating, call it public broadcasting, or call it a radio station...
    A rose by any other name is still a rose.
    The point being that the terms "intentional radiator" and "transmitter" (as in radio stations) are interchangeable, so in that respect, it's clear, the FCC does indeed consider our operations as radio stations.

    It's also evident he FCC also considers ours as radio stations when they investigate the source of any form of unlicensed broadcast, they already know it's not licensed, so next they seek to determine whether its an illegal pirate, or a legal unlicensed part 15.
    Got it?.. Licensed, pirate, or legal unlicensed.. They're all public broadcasting facilities.. So clearly, again, the FCC does consider a Part 15 broadcast as a radio station.

    In most cases the NOUO's themselves state (in variations) the FCC's view of our operations as follows;
    "..The Commission's records show that no license was issued for operation of a broadcast station on [frequency] at this location.. The only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain transmitters using or operating at a power level that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules,.."

    Now, lets take look at some other of the FCC's notices and bulletins, How do they define our Part 15 operations in this more public arena?..
    The answer is that the FCC repeatably refer to Part 15 operations as "radio stations" "radio facilities" and "broadcasters":

    A few examples:

    Low Power Broadcast Radio Stations (http://transition.fcc.gov/mb/audio/lowpwr.html)
    The Commission receives tens of thousands of inquiries annually from individuals and groups wishing to start a "low power" or "micro power" radio station for local broadcasts (AM or FM). The Audio Division has assembled this general information to answer some of the more commonly received questions on this subject....
    PART 15 DEVICES
    Unlicensed operation on the AM and FM radio broadcast bands is permitted for some extremely low powered devices covered under Part 15 of the FCC's rules.... etc. etc....... Presently, the maximum penalty for operating an unlicensed or "pirate" broadcast station (one which is not permitted under Part 15 or is not a Carrier Current Station) .....etc.... There are also criminal penalties (fine and/or imprisonment) for "willfully and knowingly" operating a radio station without a license.


    Here again, part15'ers are referred to as radio stations..:

      (http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/sed/ulo.html) "...generally, in order to use or operate a radio station, the Communications Act requires that you first obtain a license by the FCC. There are certain limited exceptions. For example, .......the Commission has authorized the operation of certain low power radios pursuant to Part 15 of the Commission's Rules. Thus, operators of these radio facilities are not required to have individual licenses. However, these operators are required to operate their stations in a manner consistent with the Commission's operational and technical rules for those services.

    And again...

    "FCC's Inspection Fact Sheet" http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/otherinfo/inspect.html
    The Enforcement Bureau conducts inspections of radio installations as part of the Bureau's function to "[e]nforce the Commission's Rules and Regulations." 47 CFR 0.111(a).
    Both licensees and non-licensees must allow an FCC Agent to inspect their radio equipment. Along with the privilege of possessing a license come responsibilities such as knowing the applicable rules, including allowing the station to be inspected. Licensees should be aware of the Commission's right to inspect. Equally important, FCC Agents are allowed to inspect the radio equipment of non-licensees. Non-licensees include those individuals or entities operating in accordance with Part 15 of the Rules. Non-licensees also include those who should have a license to operate their equipment but have not obtained a license and are operating without authority.
    Radio equipment is generally used in a commercial setting (e.g., commercial broadcast station, land mobile station, commercial delivery service) or a residential setting (e.g., amateur, citizen's band (CB) radio). Home-based businesses may also operate radio stations. This fact sheet addresses inspection of radio stations in both the commercial and residential settings."


    And a little bit further down the same document in the Q&A section..

    Q: Well then, if I am a low-power broadcaster and don't have an FCC license, they need a search warrant, right?
    A: Wrong again. The FCC agents have the authority to inspect all radio equipment; even if you do not have a license, the FCC can still inspect your equipment. Section 03(n) of the Act gives the FCC the right to inspect all "stations required to be licensed." This language covers your low-power radio station. The FCC agents are inspecting the equipment, not searching your house.


    How may references does one need to be convinced that that the FCC considers Part 15 facilities as radio stations? If the FCC did not consider us as radio stations, they would not repeatably use the terminology while referencing our operations.

    I rest my case.

    By the way, you can read the original debate at: https://www.hobbybroadcaster.net/community/index.php?topic=1225.0.




    Sunday, February 14, 2016

    Shhhh..? Don't be quiet!

    Silence may  golden, but not when it comes to your radio broadcast.
    Few of us can be constantly present in the studio during all hours of operation; that's why we have automation software, but what happens if something goes wrong with the automation, and the music.. dies?..
    --DEAD AIR--
    That's no good, no one tunes in to listen to silence.
    Pira.cz addressed this issue, and have provided free of charge to anyone, including broadcasters, a free lightweight software solution. Just 1mb in size, the Pira CZ Silence Detector monitors your audio and takes the appropriate action to remedy any prolonged silence, should it occur.
    You set it to responded to a predetermined amount of time of silence, and select from the options to: play a backup mp3, load up another application or different program to play content, reboot Windows, email or text you an alert, even actually attach a screenshot of what's going on, and more.

    Pira CZ Silence Detector is a freeware application which guards presence of audio signal on recording line of PC sound card. If no sound is present for a specified time, pre-defined tasks are executed. This application is a perfect tool for any radio station where continuous audio is important. It's free also for commercial stations.
    Even if your broadcast automation system crashes or your radio link gets out, the Pira CZ Silence Detector will make the steps to repair it, switch to backup audio source and inform executive person. Don't be afraid of hours of silence anymore!
    Yes, in case you missed it, it's completely free! Simple and easy to use. Get yours now! http://pira.cz/show.asp?art=silence